This post is directed to Rhonda Browstein's article on cyber schools. She recently published an article about cyber schools entitled, "The true cost of unchecked cyber growth."
I only read your article today because I was in Quebec last week with a
group of students on a French immersion trip. I am a teacher and administrator
at a cyber school in Pennsylvania.
I found your article unfair and misleading.
Students on language immersion trips can stay current on
their school work and travel the world at the same time with the aid of a
laptop and internet connection. We live in a changing world that is requiring
our students to change with it. Cyber Schools are schools of choice. Parents
who have a negative experience at Cyber
School can choose another
form of education. This is not the case with traditional schools. They have a
default population who are assigned as part of the compulsory education act.
I also take exception to the idea that students learning
through cyber education are not collaborating. We have 1100 high schools who
are members of a student government organization at our school. We have 50
student senators who create and implement projects like... two proms on both
sides of the state, talent shows, a protected social media discussion board,
Students against destructive decisions event, Yearbook, numerous fundraisers,
and trips to Washington DC, Harrisburg, Panama, China and Quebec. We also spend
a week with 20 high school students each year to complete the Points of Light
Youth Leadership Institute training to implement service learning projects in
communities across the state. We complete team building and leadership training
at blended education centers.
Many people make judgments about cyber education before
actually visiting one. We welcome you to visit us before you write your next
article.
No comments:
Post a Comment