Wednesday, April 12, 2017

"Whatever Sprinkles your Donut" and Tap the break lights on change.


I am the adviser for our Student Government Organization. Recently, our students organized a fundraiser to sell wrist bands to students and members of our cyber community of students. They gathered imprint ideas for the bracelets, and "Whatever Sprinkles your Donut" (Purposely grammatically incorrect) came up the winner. As I began to think about this trite saying it struck me that it reflects our current political environment. I recently watched a video from Thomas Friedman, New York Times columnist, and author of, The World is Flat". In this video he discussed globalism and its resulting acceleration of change. It was his premise that the election of Donald Trump was a response to that change. He felt that the consequences of this election could be very serious even leading to nuclear war. I am more of an optimist. Although I agree that there could be serious consequences for choosing a path of stagnation versus change, I feel that the current election is just a tap on the brakes as people feel threatened by too much change.

The choice by my students of "whatever sprinkles your donut" is a subconscious reaction to the stress my students are currently experiencing. They are living and studying in a global world where the jobs that they will be preparing for will be gone by the time that they graduate. My advice to my students is to embrace technology. Our students are currently learning in a cyber blended model of education. We have students who have formed life long relationships from all over the Commonwealth because of cyber learning. When students are considering the next step after high school they should also consider how technology interacts with that field. Technology is moving at a rapid pace, and embracing it in the field of their choice will guarantee their success after high school.

Our students in Student Government have written a legislative bill this year. The have formed a committee called The Student Legislative Initiative (SLIC). Four years ago. our students got the idea for the bill by interviewing former state Senator Lloyd Smucker. He felt that many students were not receiving the skills necessary to be successful after high school. Our students have interacted with a computer program that aligns several inventories with thier interest, skills and job or scholarship availability into an electronic portfolio. Since we originally wrote this bill several other legislators ie Dan Tuitt, Scott Wagner, Ryan Aument and Andy Dinniman,  and their staffs have helped us. In addition many of my students have graduated and are still involved in the process. You can read the bill here. This bill is designed to ease the transition from high school into the world of work by assigning every student in the Commonwealth with an electronic portfolio, that is interactive with their teacher. It is a technological solution to a traditional guidance problem.

I am currently teaching US History. In my opinion, our country had worse presidents than Donald Trump. The Warren Harding and Grant presidencies were filled with corruption and led to The Great Depression and flawed reconstruction. While Donald Trump's presidency may have a scandal similar to Nixon's Watergate, Clinton's Lewinsky or Reagan's Iran Contra he may also accomplish fair trade with China, or paid parental leave. The point here is that Trump with a more parliamentary congress may be able to end the grid lock and bring back governance to Washington. In the meantime, there may be a scandal or two, but if progressive reforms can ease the transition of the pace of change, then our students will benefit. What makes Trump an interesting politician is that he has shown signs of compromising with conservative goals in the interest of establishing pragmatic reform. In the primary season when he campaigned against Hillary Clinton, he would frequently poise Bernie Sanders against her by taking the Bernie's side. For example, Trump would talk about how unfair competition was robbing Americans of jobs, and he used similar rhetoric about Sanders in his campaign. Both Sanders and Trump were populist candidates who veered from traditional party rhetoric for pragmatic progressive reform. The Republican Party was able to realign to these populist reforms because Trump was running unopposed.

In conclusion, the pace of change has been dramatic in recent years. Our students at Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School are in a unique position to embrace technological change because they learn in a cyber and asynchronous setting. Students like Vinh Li, Josh Marzak, Ben Byler, and Hannah Nguyen have worked on our government bill project before and after graduation. They have gathered data from school districts, vendors, legislators, business and executives in education. They have faced the strain of change by embracing technology. "Whatever Sprinkles Your Donut" is a mantra that may relieve the stress that many young people feel. Change is happening too rapidly and is complicating our lives. The temptation is to give in and take the easy path. Students want to learn the skills necessary to acquire a job like our parents have. The jobs that our parents have may still be around whenever students graduate, however technology will have changed them into a description using more technological skills. If students acquire those skills they will be positioned to take change into the next generation and beyond. So go ahead and tap the breaks to slow down, "Whatever Sprinkles your Donut". I have no doubt we will catch up and even pass the rest of pack with good old Yankee ingenuity.

Thursday, December 29, 2016

A Tribute to Dan Truitt A Pennsylvania Legislator in West Chester

Dan Truitt was not re-elected to his position representing the people of the 156th District in Pennsylvania this year. As a stalwart supporter of educational choice during his tenure as a State Representative, Dan fought hard to protect the funding of charter and cyber charter schools. It is not surprising to learn that he volunteered to serve on the education committee.

Dan was always happy to provide students with learning opportunities as he went about his legislative responsibilities. He spoke at our virtual town hall meetings and welcomed students to his office as well as to the House floor.  Our Student Government Organization was able to work closely with his office to develop a guidance bill to provide the next step after high school called The Stepping Into Careers Act. His wisdom and mentorship will be sorely missed in this project, but he has left a legacy of student involvement in legislative affairs.

While Dan is a strong believer in educational innovation, he is not just an advocate. His two gifted sons have attended the University Scholars' Program at Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School. This is an out-of-the-box educational program blends virtual and experiential learning. He and his family are helping to pioneer a new way of learning that combines virtual education with real life and classroom experiences. PA Leadership Charter School and its many programs wish him success as he takes his next step on his career journey.

If other legislators read this post, please consider continuing Dan's great work of inclusive representation, innovation, and optimism in education.


Sunday, October 23, 2016

Cyber School and Online learning! (Stop PA HB 530)


Jamie Santora & The PA House of Representatives,

It is my understanding that House Bill 530 may be reconsidered this legislative session. As you know, Cyber Charter Schools already operate with approximately 75-80% of the money that the home school district receives for that same student.  Here is some information for you to consider about this bill:

·        Cyber Charter schools cannot sustain any cut to tuition funding to cyber charter schools as required in HB 530.
·        I support the provision in HB 530 for the creation of a bipartisan Commission that will have the opportunity to take an independent review of the actual costs of funding cyber education and recommend a tuition formula for charters and cyber charters.
·        I support the transparency & accountability recommendations in HB 530.

I commend the legislature for their commitment to reforming charter law, addressing accountability, operational efficiency, and financial stewardship for all charter schools. However, cutting cyber charter school funding now when more and more universities are developing Online learning platforms will not prepare our students to be on the cutting edge of learning. There is a learning gap when students transition from one platform of learning to another. Pennsylvania and the other states cannot afford this time loss due to transition as our students compete for jobs in a global economy. Recently, the State Universities Teacher Union went on strike. They were concerned about benefit reductions and pay increases, but they were also concerned about Online learning, and how this new platform will change the way they teach. Online learning is coming and there is no way to stop it. Pennsylvania has taken a leadership position in this area, and should not back off when the gap between high school and college is close to being bridged. The price of leadership is often uncomfortable change, and if funding is cut, the outcome may be reflected in our students paying the price with lower paying jobs.

Respectfully,

Pat Parris

Sunday, August 28, 2016

2016 Welcome Back to School PA Leadership (PALCS) (USP)

Dear Reader,


I have been a distance-learning educator for over thirteen years. During this time, I have seen many students who have been genuinely helped by this form of education. I want to thank the legislators and Governor in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth for not cutting Charter or Cyber Charter School funding this year. I especially want to thank Representative Dan Truitt and my own representative Jamie Santora. In this brief thank you I will attempt to explain why last years action, (or inaction) was important. 

One thing that makes our learning platforms different is access to quick responses from a teacher. Our students benefit most from this individual attention that we are able to reassure them with. They use the an Open Source Canvas platform, and we communicate with many of them each day.  Our Canvas Platform is equipped with an instant messenger to help students at formative times when they begin to struggle. This access to a learning coach will be greatly diminished by a funding cut. 

I meet with students in groups every day in a multi-media classroom. My students have formed life long friendship with other students through this setting as well as looking to their teachers as mentors. I have been able to conduct these classroom sessions while in Panama, China and Quebec. The opportunity to tutor students in this setting will be greatly diminished. Teachers will have less time for synchronous instruction if funding is cut. 

Over time we get to know our students through their writing and responses in the classroom. We can access their group interaction, as well as their knowledge and skill in academics with the technological tools of multi-media classrooms, internal email, instant messaging and highly interactive lessons.  

If our students use distance education as a form of correspondence school, then they could have been doing this in the early 20th century. While it is true that we could still develop a relationship with them through their writing, it is not a reason to spend this kind of money on learning though the Internet. There is nothing new about correspondence based learning. The Cyber Charter Schools of today use technology to rapidly reach students at critical times of learning. We can catch them at thresholds of learning to ease the transition from one concept to another. We can foster a mentoring relationship with them when we celebrate milestones of accomplishment together, and can correct or redirect them when they need it. Most importantly, we can prepare them for the 21st century in a way that could have never been accomplished in the 1900’s. 

Our students are learning to reason with technological change. This is quite different from traditional education that clings to a process that is based upon rewarding compliant behavior. In a global world of change, someone needs to be testing new methods of learning that will eventually become mainstream. As other countries catch up with our standard of living, the process of preparation for the real world of work must change with it. 

Will we regret the cuts in this funding when other countries do a better job of preparing students to interact in a world where computers are the universal language? Pennsylvania will be rewarded for their leadership in connecting real world change with the skills necessary to face it. Our legislators in Pennsylvania should follow in the footsteps of our forefathers and do the right thing. Our Commonwealth has a stellar record of advocating for woman’s suffrage, homeschooling, equal rights, and family values when they were not popular. Over time our citizens will embrace the principles of educational choice and funding which follow the student instead of the system. Who is to say that this is not the next great revolution in education, and Pennsylvania is leading the way. 
For another point of view, please read this article. http://www.dailylocal.com/opinion/20150226/another-view-defending-cyber-charter-schools

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

PA Budget passes but the devil is in the funding for Cyber Charter Schools @PAGOP

I am watching #PCN today and hoping they do not cut Cyber Charter School funding. @PAGOP, The PA Budget is passed, but the devil is in the funding. Please write a letter to your legislator with this simple message today. NO CUTS TO CYBER CHARTER SCHOOLS. We do support the transparency, accountability and reconciliation language provisions but NO CUTS !!! Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School (PALCS) PALCS Student Government


Link to “find your House Legislator”: http://www.house.state.pa.us/
Link to “find your Senator”: http://www.pasen.gov/
Senate Republican Leadership:
Joe Scarnati jscarnati@pasen.gov
Jake Corman jcorman@pasen.gov
Pat Browne pbrowne@pasen.gov
Senate Ed Committee Chair: Lloyd Smucker - lsmucker@pasen.gov
Senate Democrat Leadership:
Anthony Williams williams@pasenate.com

House R Leadership:
Mike Turzai - 
mturzai@pahousegop.com
Bryan Cutler- bcutler@pahousegop.com
Bill Adolph- wadolph@pahousegop.com
Kerry Benninghoff- kbenning@pahousegop.com
House D Leadership:
Tom Dermody- 
fdermody@pahouse.net
Joe Markosek- JMarkose@pahouse.net
Mike Hanna- mhanna@pahouse.net
House Ed Committee Chair: Stan Saylor- ssaylor@pahousegop.com


Saturday, July 9, 2016

Pennsylvania Cyber Education Funding Cuts! Contact Governor Wolf and your senator!




Dear Governor Wolfe and PA Senate,

I am writing to ask you to not support the current budget proposal by Governor Wolf that contains a proposed $27M cut to PA Cyber Charter Schools. The Commonwealth Senate is also proposing a 6.7% cut. 

My experience has  been different from what has been reported in the news about the ineffectiveness of a virtual setting in education. This year in our extra curricular student council students wrote and submitted a bill that will solve the problem of individual guidance for students in the exit step after high school. The students wrote a bill that uses technology to solve this problem. This bill has been introduced by Dan Truitt in the House of Representatives.  To solve the problem students from across the Commonwealth met in virtual classrooms with me for two years to brainstorm, and solve this difficult problem, I am the adviser for this student run organization. I do not believe we could have solved this problem in a traditional setting. The varied input from rural and urban areas filtered out blind spots in the process of developing a statewide solution.

These students have also written a constitution for their organization this year. Throughout our 12 year history our students have developed and implemented effective rules to govern their own actions. This process has resulted in international trips to Panama, an exchange program to China, proms and talent shows on both sides of the state, a self regulated forum of free speech, and a yearbook. 

Cyber charters already begin with an average of 25% less in funding than traditional district schools, although they are required to provide the same level of education. The Governor’s proposed cuts would be an 18%-20% reduction to the average basic education funding for these students that are already receiving less.These cuts would severely impact the Cyber Charter Schools’ ability to properly educate their students, especially those with specialized needs. Students attending Cyber Charter Schools do so because traditional public schools have not met their specific academic and/or personal needs. I hope that you agree with me that parents should have the right to public school choice and that their children should be treated equally no matter where they receive an education.

Sincerely,

Pat Parris

Saturday, June 4, 2016

New Pennsylvania school funding law passed!

http://www.mcall.com/news/nationworld/pennsylvania/mc-pa-school-funding-law-20160603-story.html A new funding law has been passed that increase equity among school districts and does not hurt charter schools. Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School (PALCS)  PALCS Student Government #edchat, #palcspln

There is a  $200 million 10 year phase in period with the goal of increasing equality among the rural, impoverished, and school districts with student who are learning English. The law also considers the median income of tax payers in each district.